Wearables - October - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

November

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

Email Marketing Summary: Qardio leads the wearables industry in email marketing, combining a moderate volume of emails with stellar scoring. FoodMarble and OrCam are also strong performers, though they need to address the promotional content in their emails. Lagging behind are brands like Fitbit and Apollo Neuroscience, which struggle with both volume and performance.

Email Deliverability Summary: FoodMarble takes the lead in email deliverability, boasting an outstanding spam score and well-optimized email size. OrCam follows closely, though they need to improve email size. Conversely, Fitbit faces challenges with deliverability, with a high spam score and suboptimal email size. Other brands like Levels and Supersapiens need significant improvements in both aspects.

Ads Performance Summary: Withings and Oura lead the wearables industry in advertising, publishing the most ads with diverse copies. OrCam also performs well in this regard. Lagging behind are brands like Fitbit and veri, requiring a significant boost in their advertising efforts.

Emails sent on average

3.0

Ads published on average

23

Average Spam Score

2.7

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 3.0 55.72%
FoodMarble
4

✅ Good

69.5%

✅ Good

OrCam
5

✅ Good

55.8%

⚠️ Fair

Qardio
4

✅ Good

69.0%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
6

✅ Good

49.33%

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
8

✅ Good

40.38%

❌ Poor

Quell
1

❌ Poor

56.0%

⚠️ Fair

veri
2

❌ Poor

55.0%

⚠️ Fair

Supersapiens
1

❌ Poor

35.0%

❌ Poor

Levels
5

✅ Good

57.6%

⚠️ Fair

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
3

⚠️ Fair

77.33%

✅ Good

Therabody
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Oura
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -2.69 2,230.39 kb
FoodMarble
✅ -5.8

✅ Good

475.94 kb

✅ Good

OrCam
🟧 0.42

❌ Poor

493.77 kb

✅ Good

Qardio
✅ -2.6

⚠️ Fair

981.41 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
✅ -8.25

✅ Good

5,163.32 kb

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
🟧 0.39

❌ Poor

1,880.67 kb

✅ Good

Quell
✅ -3.6

✅ Good

5,777.6 kb

❌ Poor

veri
✅ -3.7

✅ Good

1,059.79 kb

✅ Good

Supersapiens
✅ -0.1

❌ Poor

2,363.66 kb

⚠️ Fair

Levels
✅ -3.1

✅ Good

4,422.13 kb

❌ Poor

WHOOP
- -
Withings
✅ -0.1

❌ Poor

96.75 kb

✅ Good

Therabody
- -
Oura
- -

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 23.46 12.08
FoodMarble
36

❌ Poor

10

✅ Good

OrCam
37

❌ Poor

4

✅ Good

Qardio
0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
8

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
1

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Quell
30

❌ Poor

9

✅ Good

veri
3

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
1

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

WHOOP
30

❌ Poor

1

✅ Good

Withings
71

❌ Poor

29

❌ Poor

Therabody
35

❌ Poor

6

✅ Good

Oura
53

❌ Poor

21

❌ Poor

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 156 145 47.54%
FoodMarble
22

✅ Good

14

✅ Good

38.89%
OrCam
2

✅ Good

35

✅ Good

94.59%
Qardio
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
6

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
Apollo Neuroscience
0

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

100.0%
Quell
3

✅ Good

27

✅ Good

90.0%
veri
2

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

33.33%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

100.0%
WHOOP
7

✅ Good

23

✅ Good

76.67%
Withings
64

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

9.86%
Therabody
20

✅ Good

13

✅ Good

37.14%
Oura
30

✅ Good

23

✅ Good

43.4%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands