Wearables - February - 2024


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

July

2024

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

Email Marketing Insights: Veri and Fitbit lead email marketing with 7 emails each, but Veri's promotional rate is only 71%. Qardio sent 4 emails, all promotional, ensuring good engagement. Apollo Neuroscience sent 6 emails but with low promotional content. Levels and OrCam also sent a few emails, showing mixed engagement. Brands like Supersapiens and Withings sent minimal emails, struggling with performance. WHOOP, Quell, and FoodMarble have no email activity, indicating they lag in email marketing efforts.

Deliverability and Spam Scores: Fitbit stands out with a spam score of -8.41, ensuring high deliverability, though the email size is large at 3,227.24 kb. Withings also shows strong deliverability with a spam score of -5.1 and a small email size. Qardio, Veri, and Apollo Neuroscience maintain decent spam scores but need to improve email sizes for better performance. OrCam has a near-zero spam score, indicating issues. Supersapiens and Levels need improvement in both spam scores and email sizes to enhance deliverability.

Advertising Strategies and Performance: WHOOP and Therabody lead with 135 and 107 ads, respectively, showing a strong market presence. Withings follows with 41 ads but lacks diverse content. Veri and OrCam have moderate ad activity but need improvement in unique copy. Quell and Apollo Neuroscience show low ad volumes, limiting their visibility. FoodMarble performs fairly with 30 ads. Brands like Levels, Supersapiens, and Fitbit have no ad activity, significantly lagging behind in advertising efforts. Increasing ad diversity is crucial for underperforming brands.

Emails sent on average

1.9

Ads published on average

15

Average Spam Score

1.2

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 1.85 43.17%
FoodMarble
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

OrCam
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Qardio
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Fitbit - EN
2

⚠️ Fair

65.0%

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
13

✅ Good

35.69%

❌ Poor

Quell
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

veri
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Supersapiens
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Levels
7

✅ Good

45.14%

⚠️ Fair

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Therabody
2

⚠️ Fair

63.0%

✅ Good

Oura
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -1.16 3,313.36 kb
FoodMarble
- -
OrCam
- -
Qardio
- -
Fitbit - EN
✅ -10.25

✅ Good

4,333.44 kb

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
🟧 0.06

❌ Poor

3,395.74 kb

⚠️ Fair

Quell
- -
veri
- -
Supersapiens
- -
Levels
✅ -0.64

❌ Poor

3,500.99 kb

⚠️ Fair

WHOOP
- -
Withings
- -
Therabody
- 1,101.05 kb

✅ Good

Oura
- -

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 14.77 5.31
FoodMarble
5

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

OrCam
6

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Qardio
1

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
0

✅ Good

-
Apollo Neuroscience
8

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

Quell
30

❌ Poor

4

✅ Good

veri
12

✅ Good

6

❌ Poor

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

-
WHOOP
87

❌ Poor

8

❌ Poor

Withings
33

❌ Poor

0

✅ Good

Therabody
2

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

Oura
8

✅ Good

6

❌ Poor

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 92 100 52.08%
FoodMarble
5

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
OrCam
0

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

100.0%
Qardio
1

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
Fitbit - EN
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Apollo Neuroscience
8

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
Quell
18

✅ Good

12

✅ Good

40.0%
veri
4

✅ Good

8

✅ Good

66.67%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
WHOOP
35

✅ Good

52

✅ Good

59.77%
Withings
15

✅ Good

18

✅ Good

54.55%
Therabody
2

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
Oura
4

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

50.0%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands