Wearables - November - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

December

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

Email Marketing Overview: The wearables industry witnessed a remarkable surge in email activity, with an average of 9.23 emails sent per brand. Therabody leads with 26 emails, showcasing a strong email strategy. Fitbit - EN and Levels follow closely, maintaining a good balance in performance. Notably, WHOOP and Withings are lagging, with no observed email activity. Qardio and Oura display potential but need to enhance their email scoring and promotional strategies for sustained success.

Email Deliverability Insights: Deliverability metrics unveil a nuanced landscape. FoodMarble excels with a substantial decrease in spam score and optimal email size. Fitbit - EN, while excelling in spam score, faces challenges with email size, potentially impacting its overall performance. OrCam and Withings demonstrate commendable deliverability, setting them as leaders. WHOOP excels in email size optimization but falls short in spam score, indicating areas for improvement.

Advertising Performance: The industry boasts an average of 46.31 ads published per brand. WHOOP and Therabody emerge as advertising giants with 172 and 136 ads, respectively, showcasing diversity in content. Quell impresses with a balanced mix of images and videos, while OrCam's exclusive use of images demands a strategic shift. Fitbit - EN and Apollo Neuroscience need to ramp up their advertising efforts to stay competitive. This summary equips the executive board with actionable insights for strategic decision-making in the dynamic wearables market.

Emails sent on average

9.2

Ads published on average

46

Average Spam Score

3.5

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 9.23 51.6%
FoodMarble
4

❌ Poor

63.25%

✅ Good

OrCam
9

⚠️ Fair

67.56%

✅ Good

Qardio
9

⚠️ Fair

66.56%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
22

✅ Good

52.59%

⚠️ Fair

Apollo Neuroscience
11

✅ Good

42.36%

❌ Poor

Quell
7

❌ Poor

53.14%

⚠️ Fair

veri
4

❌ Poor

40.75%

❌ Poor

Supersapiens
5

❌ Poor

60.2%

✅ Good

Levels
14

✅ Good

53.93%

⚠️ Fair

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
4

❌ Poor

76.0%

✅ Good

Therabody
26

✅ Good

38.58%

❌ Poor

Oura
5

❌ Poor

42.2%

❌ Poor

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -3.47 3,347.28 kb
FoodMarble
✅ -4.55

✅ Good

1,016.55 kb

✅ Good

OrCam
✅ -4.09

✅ Good

396.59 kb

✅ Good

Qardio
✅ -2.44

❌ Poor

1,042.99 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
✅ -6.99

✅ Good

4,256.53 kb

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
✅ -0.81

❌ Poor

3,158.04 kb

⚠️ Fair

Quell
✅ -2.43

❌ Poor

9,334.93 kb

❌ Poor

veri
✅ -1.95

❌ Poor

1,657.01 kb

✅ Good

Supersapiens
✅ -3.62

⚠️ Fair

3,606.02 kb

⚠️ Fair

Levels
✅ -2.87

❌ Poor

3,542.87 kb

⚠️ Fair

WHOOP
- -
Withings
✅ -3.88

✅ Good

361.43 kb

✅ Good

Therabody
✅ -1.82

❌ Poor

3,975.86 kb

❌ Poor

Oura
✅ -0.1

❌ Poor

2,369.67 kb

✅ Good

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 46.31 16.77
FoodMarble
47

⚠️ Fair

8

✅ Good

OrCam
42

⚠️ Fair

6

✅ Good

Qardio
0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
19

✅ Good

9

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
12

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

Quell
49

⚠️ Fair

9

✅ Good

veri
5

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

-
WHOOP
172

❌ Poor

10

✅ Good

Withings
64

❌ Poor

5

✅ Good

Therabody
136

❌ Poor

36

❌ Poor

Oura
56

❌ Poor

28

❌ Poor

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 369 233 38.7%
FoodMarble
30

✅ Good

17

✅ Good

36.17%
OrCam
0

✅ Good

42

✅ Good

100.0%
Qardio
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
19

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
Apollo Neuroscience
9

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

25.0%
Quell
25

✅ Good

24

✅ Good

48.98%
veri
3

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

40.0%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
WHOOP
68

✅ Good

104

✅ Good

60.47%
Withings
59

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

7.81%
Therabody
119

✅ Good

17

✅ Good

12.5%
Oura
37

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

33.93%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands