Wearables - January - 2024


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

April

2024

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

Email Marketing Performance: Apollo Neuroscience leads in email marketing with 8 emails sent, displaying good performance despite a poor email scoring, suggesting potential for improvement in content relevance. Levels follows with 7 emails sent, demonstrating good email performance despite a fair promotion ratio. veri secures a notable position with 4 emails sent, showcasing good email performance despite a fair promotion ratio.

Email Deliverability and Spam Scores: FoodMarble showcases exceptional email deliverability with a positive spam score and efficient email size management, underscoring its robust presence in the wearables brands industry. OrCam exhibits commendable email deliverability with a positive spam score, although it faces challenges with email size management, reflecting its notable position in the market. Qardio demonstrates strong email deliverability with a positive spam score, indicating its potential for further optimization in email size management.

Advertising Impact and Diversity: WHOOP dominates in advertising impact with 86 impactful ads, emphasizing both volume and diversity in ad content, reflecting its strong market presence in the wearables brands industry. Therabody closely follows with 63 impactful ads, showcasing a variety of unique copies and a balanced proportion of video content. Withings demonstrates solid advertising strategies with 38 impactful ads, focusing on volume and a diverse range of ad content.

Emails sent on average

2.1

Ads published on average

23

Average Spam Score

2.8

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 2.08 51.19%
FoodMarble
1

❌ Poor

34.0%

❌ Poor

OrCam
1

❌ Poor

56.0%

⚠️ Fair

Qardio
1

❌ Poor

58.0%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
1

❌ Poor

73.0%

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
8

✅ Good

44.0%

❌ Poor

Quell
1

❌ Poor

73.0%

✅ Good

veri
4

✅ Good

46.5%

⚠️ Fair

Supersapiens
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Levels
7

✅ Good

53.14%

⚠️ Fair

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
1

❌ Poor

79.0%

✅ Good

Therabody
2

⚠️ Fair

49.5%

⚠️ Fair

Oura
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -2.78 2,664.92 kb
FoodMarble
✅ -1.1

❌ Poor

1,857.26 kb

✅ Good

OrCam
✅ -0.1

❌ Poor

1,404.73 kb

✅ Good

Qardio
✅ -5.1

✅ Good

1,863.24 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
✅ -7.6

✅ Good

35.91 kb

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
✅ -1.98

❌ Poor

2,819.45 kb

⚠️ Fair

Quell
✅ -5.1

✅ Good

4,261.73 kb

❌ Poor

veri
✅ -2.5

⚠️ Fair

2,175.75 kb

✅ Good

Supersapiens
- -
Levels
✅ -2.79

⚠️ Fair

3,779.35 kb

❌ Poor

WHOOP
- -
Withings
✅ -5.1

✅ Good

1,242.62 kb

✅ Good

Therabody
- 1,786.63 kb

✅ Good

Oura
- -

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 22.62 9.77
FoodMarble
0

✅ Good

-
OrCam
28

❌ Poor

4

✅ Good

Qardio
0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
1

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
5

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Quell
34

❌ Poor

16

❌ Poor

veri
8

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

-
WHOOP
86

❌ Poor

0

✅ Good

Withings
38

❌ Poor

1

✅ Good

Therabody
63

❌ Poor

20

❌ Poor

Oura
31

❌ Poor

18

❌ Poor

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 141 153 52.04%
FoodMarble
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
OrCam
0

✅ Good

28

✅ Good

100.0%
Qardio
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
1

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
Apollo Neuroscience
0

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

100.0%
Quell
11

✅ Good

23

✅ Good

67.65%
veri
4

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

50.0%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
WHOOP
25

✅ Good

61

✅ Good

70.93%
Withings
36

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

5.26%
Therabody
44

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

30.16%
Oura
20

✅ Good

11

✅ Good

35.48%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands