Wearables - May - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

June

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

In May, the wearable brands of the benchmark did not send a significant number of emails. Therabody took the lead with a total of 12 emails, followed by Apollo Neuroscience with 8 emails.

When it comes to ads, Therabody emerged as the leader with 132 new ads and the highest number of ad copies used (51). WHOOP secured the second position with 81 new ads created.

In terms of ad strategy, Therabody showed a preference for videos over images, while WHOOP focused more on images. Therabody used 70 videos compared to 43 images, while WHOOP utilized 55 images and 24 videos.

Emails sent on average

3.9

Ads published on average

41

Average Spam Score

3.0

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 3.92 54.35%
FoodMarble
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

OrCam
4

⚠️ Fair

66.5%

✅ Good

Qardio
6

✅ Good

66.67%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
6

✅ Good

52.33%

⚠️ Fair

Apollo Neuroscience
8

✅ Good

55.88%

⚠️ Fair

Quell
2

❌ Poor

60.0%

✅ Good

veri
5

✅ Good

60.6%

✅ Good

Supersapiens
2

❌ Poor

48.0%

❌ Poor

Levels
2

❌ Poor

38.5%

❌ Poor

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Therabody
12

✅ Good

44.42%

❌ Poor

Oura
4

⚠️ Fair

54.0%

⚠️ Fair

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -3.01 2,562.2 kb
FoodMarble
- -
OrCam
✅ -2.6

❌ Poor

361.57 kb

✅ Good

Qardio
✅ -2.87

⚠️ Fair

865.99 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
✅ -8.53

✅ Good

5,010.62 kb

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
✅ -3.91

✅ Good

2,427.56 kb

⚠️ Fair

Quell
✅ -0.1

❌ Poor

771.33 kb

✅ Good

veri
✅ -3.0

⚠️ Fair

3,783.59 kb

❌ Poor

Supersapiens
✅ -0.1

❌ Poor

4,641.09 kb

❌ Poor

Levels
- 2,362.33 kb

⚠️ Fair

WHOOP
- -
Withings
- -
Therabody
✅ -1.03

❌ Poor

2,885.12 kb

❌ Poor

Oura
✅ -2.6

❌ Poor

1,364.22 kb

✅ Good

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 40.77 17.38
FoodMarble
37

⚠️ Fair

10

✅ Good

OrCam
72

❌ Poor

16

⚠️ Fair

Qardio
0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
50

❌ Poor

28

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
28

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

Quell
4

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

veri
26

✅ Good

9

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
6

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

WHOOP
81

❌ Poor

6

✅ Good

Withings
17

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

Therabody
132

❌ Poor

15

✅ Good

Oura
77

❌ Poor

8

✅ Good

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 213 261 49.25%
FoodMarble
12

✅ Good

20

✅ Good

54.05%
OrCam
4

✅ Good

62

✅ Good

86.11%
Qardio
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
16

✅ Good

16

✅ Good

32.0%
Apollo Neuroscience
7

✅ Good

21

✅ Good

75.0%
Quell
2

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

50.0%
veri
9

✅ Good

13

✅ Good

50.0%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

66.67%
WHOOP
55

✅ Good

24

✅ Good

29.63%
Withings
7

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

58.82%
Therabody
43

✅ Good

70

✅ Good

53.03%
Oura
58

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

24.68%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands