Wearables - March - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

March

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

Despite the relatively low number of emails sent by brands in the wearables industry during the month of March, there were some notable players in the advertising side. Oura, with 97 new ads and 39 ad copies, stood out as a brand that heavily relied on videos in their advertising strategy, with 79% of their new ads being video-based. Withings, on the other hand, created 59 new ads and 30 ad copies, with a preference for using images in their ads. Only 12% of their new ads were videos. Lastly, Therabody created 53 new ads and 31 ad copies, with a staggering 98% of their ads containing videos, making them a brand that is clearly focused on video marketing.

Emails sent on average

4.2

Ads published on average

25

Average Spam Score

2.2

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 4.15 54.57%
FoodMarble
3

❌ Poor

66.33%

✅ Good

OrCam
9

✅ Good

57.0%

⚠️ Fair

Qardio
5

✅ Good

68.8%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
11

✅ Good

47.36%

❌ Poor

Quell
2

❌ Poor

76.0%

✅ Good

veri
3

❌ Poor

64.0%

✅ Good

Supersapiens
5

✅ Good

49.2%

⚠️ Fair

Levels
2

❌ Poor

42.0%

❌ Poor

WHOOP
3

❌ Poor

58.0%

⚠️ Fair

Withings
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Therabody
5

✅ Good

44.0%

❌ Poor

Oura
6

✅ Good

50.33%

⚠️ Fair

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -2.17 1,864.07 kb
FoodMarble
✅ -2.6

✅ Good

684.41 kb

✅ Good

OrCam
✅ -2.87

✅ Good

742.46 kb

✅ Good

Qardio
✅ -4.42

✅ Good

1,152.24 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
- -
Apollo Neuroscience
🟧 0.42

❌ Poor

1,609.23 kb

✅ Good

Quell
✅ -3.8

✅ Good

1,500.85 kb

✅ Good

veri
✅ -4.1

✅ Good

592.87 kb

✅ Good

Supersapiens
✅ -2.1

⚠️ Fair

4,027.48 kb

❌ Poor

Levels
- 1,357.85 kb

✅ Good

WHOOP
✅ -1.1

❌ Poor

2,435.36 kb

❌ Poor

Withings
- -
Therabody
✅ -2.06

⚠️ Fair

3,947.73 kb

❌ Poor

Oura
✅ -2.6

✅ Good

2,297.27 kb

❌ Poor

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 25.46 13.92
FoodMarble
10

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

OrCam
29

❌ Poor

12

✅ Good

Qardio
0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
17

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
17

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

Quell
7

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

veri
22

✅ Good

12

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
2

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

WHOOP
18

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

Withings
59

❌ Poor

20

❌ Poor

Therabody
53

❌ Poor

17

❌ Poor

Oura
97

❌ Poor

39

❌ Poor

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 132 134 47.69%
FoodMarble
0

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

60.0%
OrCam
0

✅ Good

29

✅ Good

100.0%
Qardio
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
15

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

5.88%
Apollo Neuroscience
9

✅ Good

8

✅ Good

47.06%
Quell
3

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

57.14%
veri
5

✅ Good

15

✅ Good

68.18%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

100.0%
WHOOP
13

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

27.78%
Withings
49

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

11.86%
Therabody
1

✅ Good

47

✅ Good

88.68%
Oura
37

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

21.28%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands