Wearables - June - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

July

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

In the month of June, Therabody and Apollo Neuroscience maintained their positions as leaders in email communications. However, there was a shift in their performance, with Apollo Neuroscience taking the lead by sending 16 emails, surpassing Therabody's 11 emails.

Turning our attention to advertising efforts, Therabody demonstrated its continued dominance by creating 139 new ads, accompanied by the highest number of ad copies (42) among all the brands in the benchmark. Meanwhile, Withings secured the second position with 77 new ads.

When it comes to their ad media strategies, both Therabody and Withings opted to prioritize videos over images. Therabody leveraged 83 videos alongside 28 images and Withings incorporated 52 videos complemented by 25 images.

Emails sent on average

5.0

Ads published on average

38

Average Spam Score

2.1

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 5.0 52.83%
FoodMarble
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

OrCam
9

✅ Good

58.67%

✅ Good

Qardio
6

✅ Good

71.0%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
4

❌ Poor

52.25%

⚠️ Fair

Apollo Neuroscience
16

✅ Good

50.69%

⚠️ Fair

Quell
6

✅ Good

39.17%

❌ Poor

veri
2

❌ Poor

53.5%

⚠️ Fair

Supersapiens
4

❌ Poor

49.5%

⚠️ Fair

Levels
1

❌ Poor

39.0%

❌ Poor

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
2

❌ Poor

48.0%

⚠️ Fair

Therabody
11

✅ Good

53.45%

⚠️ Fair

Oura
4

❌ Poor

49.25%

⚠️ Fair

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -2.12 2,306.73 kb
FoodMarble
- -
OrCam
✅ -1.74

❌ Poor

868.81 kb

✅ Good

Qardio
✅ -1.07

❌ Poor

657.32 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
✅ -10.1

✅ Good

4,625.93 kb

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
✅ -0.77

❌ Poor

1,106.73 kb

✅ Good

Quell
✅ -1.43

❌ Poor

6,230.48 kb

❌ Poor

veri
✅ -0.5

❌ Poor

1,008.3 kb

✅ Good

Supersapiens
✅ -1.35

❌ Poor

4,454.27 kb

❌ Poor

Levels
- 1,674.35 kb

✅ Good

WHOOP
- -
Withings
✅ -0.1

❌ Poor

1,487.03 kb

✅ Good

Therabody
✅ -3.27

✅ Good

3,042.43 kb

❌ Poor

Oura
✅ -2.1

⚠️ Fair

1,657.77 kb

✅ Good

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 38.0 15.85
FoodMarble
22

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

OrCam
63

❌ Poor

7

✅ Good

Qardio
0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
27

✅ Good

21

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
42

❌ Poor

11

✅ Good

Quell
14

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

veri
14

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
13

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

WHOOP
63

❌ Poor

3

✅ Good

Withings
77

❌ Poor

24

❌ Poor

Therabody
139

❌ Poor

11

✅ Good

Oura
20

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 156 292 59.11%
FoodMarble
2

✅ Good

20

✅ Good

90.91%
OrCam
8

✅ Good

49

✅ Good

77.78%
Qardio
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
11

✅ Good

9

✅ Good

33.33%
Apollo Neuroscience
22

✅ Good

20

✅ Good

47.62%
Quell
6

✅ Good

8

✅ Good

57.14%
veri
5

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

50.0%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
4

✅ Good

8

✅ Good

61.54%
WHOOP
31

✅ Good

32

✅ Good

50.79%
Withings
25

✅ Good

52

✅ Good

67.53%
Therabody
28

✅ Good

83

✅ Good

59.71%
Oura
14

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

20.0%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands