Wearables - July - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

August

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

In July, the highest volume of emails was sent by Therabody, totaling 10 emails, out of which 70% were promotional. OrCam closely followed with 9 emails.

In terms of advertising, Whoop took the lead with 88 new ads created. Withings secured the second position with 76 new ads and the highest count of ad copies (36).

Regarding their ad strategy, Whoop placed a priority on videos, utilizing 50 videos in contrast to 35 images. Meanwhile, Withings leaned towards images, employing 55 images compared to 21 videos.

Emails sent on average

3.6

Ads published on average

32

Average Spam Score

3.0

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 3.62 56.32%
FoodMarble
2

❌ Poor

68.0%

✅ Good

OrCam
9

✅ Good

60.44%

⚠️ Fair

Qardio
5

✅ Good

67.8%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
5

✅ Good

54.4%

⚠️ Fair

Apollo Neuroscience
6

✅ Good

56.17%

⚠️ Fair

Quell
1

❌ Poor

60.0%

⚠️ Fair

veri
2

❌ Poor

51.5%

⚠️ Fair

Supersapiens
4

✅ Good

52.0%

⚠️ Fair

Levels
2

❌ Poor

50.5%

❌ Poor

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Therabody
10

✅ Good

48.9%

❌ Poor

Oura
1

❌ Poor

58.0%

⚠️ Fair

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -2.99 2,439.93 kb
FoodMarble
✅ -1.0

❌ Poor

289.41 kb

✅ Good

OrCam
✅ -2.16

❌ Poor

1,339.32 kb

✅ Good

Qardio
✅ -3.86

✅ Good

749.02 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
✅ -8.6

✅ Good

3,534.51 kb

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
✅ -3.23

⚠️ Fair

1,387.66 kb

✅ Good

Quell
✅ -5.1

✅ Good

11,657.53 kb

❌ Poor

veri
✅ 0.0

❌ Poor

1,121.06 kb

✅ Good

Supersapiens
✅ -3.55

✅ Good

3,368.49 kb

❌ Poor

Levels
✅ -1.4

❌ Poor

4,552.77 kb

❌ Poor

WHOOP
- -
Withings
- -
Therabody
✅ -1.01

❌ Poor

3,166.48 kb

❌ Poor

Oura
✅ -5.1

✅ Good

4,156.39 kb

❌ Poor

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 31.54 14.85
FoodMarble
22

✅ Good

9

✅ Good

OrCam
37

❌ Poor

13

✅ Good

Qardio
0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
20

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
27

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Quell
25

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

veri
26

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
34

⚠️ Fair

8

✅ Good

WHOOP
88

❌ Poor

17

❌ Poor

Withings
76

❌ Poor

21

❌ Poor

Therabody
30

⚠️ Fair

12

✅ Good

Oura
25

✅ Good

13

✅ Good

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 134 257 62.68%
FoodMarble
7

✅ Good

14

✅ Good

63.64%
OrCam
5

✅ Good

31

✅ Good

83.78%
Qardio
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
0

✅ Good

16

✅ Good

80.0%
Apollo Neuroscience
3

✅ Good

24

✅ Good

88.89%
Quell
4

✅ Good

21

✅ Good

84.0%
veri
5

✅ Good

21

✅ Good

80.77%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
10

✅ Good

24

✅ Good

70.59%
WHOOP
35

✅ Good

50

✅ Good

56.82%
Withings
55

✅ Good

21

✅ Good

27.63%
Therabody
2

✅ Good

21

✅ Good

70.0%
Oura
8

✅ Good

14

✅ Good

56.0%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands