Wearables - August - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

September

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

Email Marketing Summary: Qardio leads the wearables industry in email marketing with the highest email scoring and a low percentage of promotions. Apollo Neuroscience and Therabody also perform well in email marketing, achieving good email scoring. Brands like Fitbit - EN and Quell lag behind in email marketing.

Email Deliverability Summary: FoodMarble excels in email deliverability with the best average spam score and optimized email size. Qardio and Withings also perform well in email deliverability. Brands like Fitbit - EN and Therabody need to improve their email deliverability.

Ads Performance Summary: WHOOP leads in advertising with the highest number of new ads detected and a variety of unique copies. Withings and OrCam also perform well in ads. Brands like Supersapiens and Levels are lagging behind in ad performance.

Social Ads Diversity Summary: OrCam stands out in social ad diversity with a high proportion of videos. Apollo Neuroscience and Quell also perform well in this aspect. Brands like Fitbit - EN and Levels need to diversify their social ads with more videos.

In summary, Qardio leads in email marketing, while FoodMarble excels in email deliverability. WHOOP is the leader in advertising, and OrCam stands out in social ad diversity. Brands like Fitbit - EN and Supersapiens need to improve their email marketing and ad performance to compete effectively in the wearables industry.

Emails sent on average

3.5

Ads published on average

29

Average Spam Score

1.9

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 3.54 56.87%
FoodMarble
1

❌ Poor

72.0%

✅ Good

OrCam
4

✅ Good

53.5%

⚠️ Fair

Qardio
7

✅ Good

69.71%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
4

✅ Good

49.75%

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
10

✅ Good

52.7%

⚠️ Fair

Quell
2

❌ Poor

50.0%

❌ Poor

veri
5

✅ Good

52.6%

⚠️ Fair

Supersapiens
4

✅ Good

44.75%

❌ Poor

Levels
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
4

✅ Good

75.0%

✅ Good

Therabody
5

✅ Good

54.8%

⚠️ Fair

Oura
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -1.86 1,794.48 kb
FoodMarble
✅ -6.0

✅ Good

690.68 kb

✅ Good

OrCam
✅ -0.7

❌ Poor

2,036.27 kb

❌ Poor

Qardio
✅ -2.36

✅ Good

749.7 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
✅ -6.35

✅ Good

4,592.69 kb

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
✅ -0.4

❌ Poor

1,001.81 kb

✅ Good

Quell
✅ -0.1

❌ Poor

2,199.1 kb

❌ Poor

veri
✅ -0.26

❌ Poor

1,145.37 kb

✅ Good

Supersapiens
✅ -1.05

❌ Poor

3,628.89 kb

❌ Poor

Levels
- -
WHOOP
- -
Withings
✅ -3.85

✅ Good

221.6 kb

✅ Good

Therabody
✅ -1.94

⚠️ Fair

2,909.32 kb

❌ Poor

Oura
- -

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 29.23 13.31
FoodMarble
37

❌ Poor

15

❌ Poor

OrCam
38

❌ Poor

6

✅ Good

Qardio
0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
18

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
32

⚠️ Fair

3

✅ Good

Quell
33

❌ Poor

3

✅ Good

veri
34

❌ Poor

7

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
15

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

WHOOP
69

❌ Poor

7

✅ Good

Withings
43

❌ Poor

9

✅ Good

Therabody
33

❌ Poor

15

❌ Poor

Oura
28

⚠️ Fair

17

❌ Poor

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 160 199 52.37%
FoodMarble
18

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

51.35%
OrCam
2

✅ Good

36

✅ Good

94.74%
Qardio
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Fitbit - EN
6

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

33.33%
Apollo Neuroscience
9

✅ Good

23

✅ Good

71.88%
Quell
5

✅ Good

28

✅ Good

84.85%
veri
18

✅ Good

15

✅ Good

44.12%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
4

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

66.67%
WHOOP
38

✅ Good

28

✅ Good

40.58%
Withings
33

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

23.26%
Therabody
13

✅ Good

13

✅ Good

39.39%
Oura
14

✅ Good

11

✅ Good

39.29%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands