Wearables - April - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Wearables

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Wearables

industry, for the month of

May

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

In April, the wearables industry once again experienced a low number of emails. Therabody emerged as the frontrunner in terms of emails with 11, closely followed by Apollo Neuroscience with 10 emails.

Therabody continued its dominance in the advertising arena, leading with 49 new ads and the highest number of ad copies utilized this month with 22 ad copies. WHOOP secured the second position with 42 new ads.

When it comes to ad strategy, both Therabody and WHOOP leaned towards video content. Therabody showcased 44 videos alongside a minimal number of 3 images, while WHOOP utilized 25 videos and 17 images to effectively convey their message.

Emails sent on average

5.1

Ads published on average

22

Average Spam Score

3.0

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 5.08 55.55%
FoodMarble
2

❌ Poor

59.5%

⚠️ Fair

OrCam
7

✅ Good

64.57%

✅ Good

Qardio
7

✅ Good

72.14%

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
9

✅ Good

59.0%

⚠️ Fair

Apollo Neuroscience
11

✅ Good

40.36%

❌ Poor

Quell
6

✅ Good

55.33%

⚠️ Fair

veri
4

❌ Poor

67.75%

✅ Good

Supersapiens
2

❌ Poor

65.0%

✅ Good

Levels
2

❌ Poor

29.0%

❌ Poor

WHOOP
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Withings
3

❌ Poor

59.67%

⚠️ Fair

Therabody
11

✅ Good

45.36%

❌ Poor

Oura
2

❌ Poor

73.0%

✅ Good

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -3.0 2,426.31 kb
FoodMarble
✅ -1.0

❌ Poor

499.61 kb

✅ Good

OrCam
✅ -2.24

❌ Poor

380.71 kb

✅ Good

Qardio
✅ -4.24

✅ Good

922.46 kb

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
✅ -7.98

✅ Good

4,390.36 kb

❌ Poor

Apollo Neuroscience
✅ -0.59

❌ Poor

2,088.23 kb

✅ Good

Quell
🟧 0.05

❌ Poor

5,113.37 kb

❌ Poor

veri
✅ -4.25

✅ Good

848.51 kb

✅ Good

Supersapiens
✅ -5.1

✅ Good

1,091.92 kb

✅ Good

Levels
- 2,692.14 kb

❌ Poor

WHOOP
- -
Withings
✅ -1.07

❌ Poor

1,433.93 kb

✅ Good

Therabody
✅ -1.92

❌ Poor

3,609.8 kb

❌ Poor

Oura
✅ -5.1

✅ Good

939.75 kb

✅ Good

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 21.62 10.38
FoodMarble
24

❌ Poor

14

❌ Poor

OrCam
8

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

Qardio
9

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

Fitbit - EN
41

❌ Poor

9

✅ Good

Apollo Neuroscience
40

❌ Poor

6

✅ Good

Quell
4

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

veri
19

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

-
Levels
4

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

WHOOP
42

❌ Poor

1

✅ Good

Withings
2

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

Therabody
49

❌ Poor

12

❌ Poor

Oura
39

❌ Poor

10

⚠️ Fair

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 101 158 56.23%
FoodMarble
8

✅ Good

14

✅ Good

58.33%
OrCam
0

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

87.5%
Qardio
2

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

77.78%
Fitbit - EN
25

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

7.32%
Apollo Neuroscience
23

✅ Good

17

✅ Good

42.5%
Quell
0

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

100.0%
veri
3

✅ Good

12

✅ Good

63.16%
Supersapiens
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Levels
0

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

100.0%
WHOOP
17

✅ Good

25

✅ Good

59.52%
Withings
0

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

100.0%
Therabody
3

✅ Good

44

✅ Good

89.8%
Oura
20

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

48.72%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Wearables - February - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - January - 2024

READ MORE

Wearables - December - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - November - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - October - 2023

READ MORE

Wearables - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands