Underwear - July - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Underwear

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Underwear

industry, for the month of

August

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

In July, Shapermint continues to maintain its lead in emails with a total of 52 emails. MeUndies followed with 29 emails.

In terms of advertising, Savage X retains its top position with 110 new ads this month. Lounge Underwear secures the second position with 108 new ads and the highest number of ad copies (90) compared to the benchmark's brands.

Regarding ad strategy, both Savage X and Lounge Underwear continue to prioritize images this month. Savage X used 56 images vs. 49 videos, while Lounge Underwear utilized 63 images vs. 43 videos.

Emails sent on average

15.8

Ads published on average

62

Average Spam Score

3.8

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 15.8 59.81%
Heist
11

❌ Poor

53.18%

❌ Poor

SAXX Underwear
18

✅ Good

48.06%

❌ Poor

Culprit Underwear
13

❌ Poor

64.38%

⚠️ Fair

PSD Underwear
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

JustWears
7

❌ Poor

48.71%

❌ Poor

Lounge Underwear
17

⚠️ Fair

57.41%

⚠️ Fair

Parade
28

✅ Good

58.25%

⚠️ Fair

Icone Lingerie
7

❌ Poor

53.71%

❌ Poor

Savage X
3

❌ Poor

58.33%

⚠️ Fair

MeUndies
29

✅ Good

58.17%

⚠️ Fair

Pepper
22

✅ Good

82.18%

✅ Good

Cuup
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Negative Underwear
13

❌ Poor

60.08%

⚠️ Fair

Shinesty
17

⚠️ Fair

47.06%

❌ Poor

Shapermint
52

✅ Good

63.69%

⚠️ Fair

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -3.75 3,505.45 kb
Heist
✅ -1.7

❌ Poor

6,635.51 kb

❌ Poor

SAXX Underwear
✅ -2.86

❌ Poor

4,463.19 kb

❌ Poor

Culprit Underwear
✅ -2.44

❌ Poor

2,193.28 kb

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
- -
JustWears
✅ -2.86

❌ Poor

4,298.03 kb

❌ Poor

Lounge Underwear
✅ -3.92

⚠️ Fair

5,369.68 kb

❌ Poor

Parade
✅ -1.9

❌ Poor

4,773.17 kb

❌ Poor

Icone Lingerie
✅ -2.53

❌ Poor

4,872.34 kb

❌ Poor

Savage X
✅ -1.77

❌ Poor

776.97 kb

✅ Good

MeUndies
✅ -2.53

❌ Poor

2,180.47 kb

✅ Good

Pepper
✅ -2.54

❌ Poor

490.57 kb

✅ Good

Cuup
- -
Negative Underwear
✅ -2.73

❌ Poor

2,999.59 kb

✅ Good

Shinesty
✅ -1.22

❌ Poor

6,307.38 kb

❌ Poor

Shapermint
✅ -8.36

✅ Good

2,639.39 kb

✅ Good

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 61.6 31.67
Heist
4

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

SAXX Underwear
89

❌ Poor

7

✅ Good

Culprit Underwear
11

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
51

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

JustWears
32

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

Lounge Underwear
108

❌ Poor

77

❌ Poor

Parade
80

❌ Poor

41

❌ Poor

Icone Lingerie
15

✅ Good

9

✅ Good

Savage X
110

❌ Poor

52

❌ Poor

MeUndies
73

❌ Poor

6

✅ Good

Pepper
50

✅ Good

11

✅ Good

Cuup
77

❌ Poor

5

✅ Good

Negative Underwear
54

✅ Good

24

✅ Good

Shinesty
90

❌ Poor

49

❌ Poor

Shapermint
80

❌ Poor

16

✅ Good

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 470 432 46.75%
Heist
3

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

25.0%
SAXX Underwear
56

✅ Good

33

✅ Good

37.08%
Culprit Underwear
0

✅ Good

11

✅ Good

100.0%
PSD Underwear
8

✅ Good

35

✅ Good

68.63%
JustWears
24

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

21.88%
Lounge Underwear
63

✅ Good

43

✅ Good

39.81%
Parade
27

✅ Good

53

✅ Good

66.25%
Icone Lingerie
10

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

26.67%
Savage X
56

✅ Good

49

✅ Good

44.55%
MeUndies
54

✅ Good

17

✅ Good

23.29%
Pepper
9

✅ Good

41

✅ Good

82.0%
Cuup
77

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
Negative Underwear
34

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

35.19%
Shinesty
26

✅ Good

64

✅ Good

71.11%
Shapermint
23

✅ Good

55

✅ Good

68.75%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Underwear - February - 2024

READ MORE

Underwear - January - 2024

READ MORE

Underwear - December - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - November - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - October - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands