Underwear - February - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Underwear

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Underwear

industry, for the month of

March

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

During February, Shaprmint, Savage X, and Parade sent 53, 32, and 27 emails respectively. MeUndies produced the highest number of advertisements, creating 93 new ads, a significant increase from the 33 ads they created in the previous month. This surge in advertising output could be attributed to a greater emphasis on marketing initiatives in the second month of the year.

Emails sent on average

16.5

Ads published on average

31

Average Spam Score

3.4

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 16.53 59.47%
Heist
5

❌ Poor

50.6%

❌ Poor

SAXX Underwear
21

✅ Good

48.67%

❌ Poor

Culprit Underwear
18

⚠️ Fair

65.17%

⚠️ Fair

PSD Underwear
17

⚠️ Fair

52.88%

❌ Poor

JustWears
7

❌ Poor

51.86%

❌ Poor

Lounge Underwear
1

❌ Poor

60.0%

⚠️ Fair

Parade
27

✅ Good

56.26%

⚠️ Fair

Icone Lingerie
6

❌ Poor

62.67%

⚠️ Fair

Savage X
32

✅ Good

55.44%

⚠️ Fair

MeUndies
21

✅ Good

58.0%

⚠️ Fair

Pepper
19

✅ Good

77.74%

✅ Good

Cuup
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Negative Underwear
13

❌ Poor

53.85%

⚠️ Fair

Shinesty
8

❌ Poor

47.88%

❌ Poor

Shapermint
53

✅ Good

66.62%

✅ Good

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -3.44 2,852.78 kb
Heist
✅ -0.84

❌ Poor

3,959.78 kb

❌ Poor

SAXX Underwear
✅ -2.62

❌ Poor

3,985.65 kb

❌ Poor

Culprit Underwear
✅ -2.28

❌ Poor

1,207.0 kb

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
✅ -1.67

❌ Poor

3,165.54 kb

❌ Poor

JustWears
✅ -1.24

❌ Poor

4,436.69 kb

❌ Poor

Lounge Underwear
✅ -5.1

✅ Good

3,664.99 kb

❌ Poor

Parade
✅ -1.79

❌ Poor

7,237.13 kb

❌ Poor

Icone Lingerie
✅ -3.83

✅ Good

4,235.77 kb

❌ Poor

Savage X
✅ -3.05

❌ Poor

1,889.61 kb

✅ Good

MeUndies
✅ -2.7

❌ Poor

2,123.72 kb

✅ Good

Pepper
✅ -2.25

❌ Poor

452.3 kb

✅ Good

Cuup
- -
Negative Underwear
✅ -0.73

❌ Poor

3,558.39 kb

❌ Poor

Shinesty
✅ -1.79

❌ Poor

5,727.78 kb

❌ Poor

Shapermint
✅ -7.85

✅ Good

1,267.4 kb

✅ Good

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 30.6 13.73
Heist
0

✅ Good

-
SAXX Underwear
30

⚠️ Fair

1

✅ Good

Culprit Underwear
7

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
44

❌ Poor

12

✅ Good

JustWears
37

❌ Poor

1

✅ Good

Lounge Underwear
30

⚠️ Fair

20

❌ Poor

Parade
59

❌ Poor

27

❌ Poor

Icone Lingerie
7

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

Savage X
0

✅ Good

-
MeUndies
93

❌ Poor

25

❌ Poor

Pepper
19

✅ Good

12

✅ Good

Cuup
46

❌ Poor

7

✅ Good

Negative Underwear
27

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

Shinesty
30

⚠️ Fair

15

⚠️ Fair

Shapermint
30

⚠️ Fair

2

✅ Good

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 192 189 47.97%
Heist
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
SAXX Underwear
18

✅ Good

12

✅ Good

40.0%
Culprit Underwear
0

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

100.0%
PSD Underwear
5

✅ Good

32

✅ Good

72.73%
JustWears
9

✅ Good

28

✅ Good

75.68%
Lounge Underwear
17

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

33.33%
Parade
6

✅ Good

21

✅ Good

77.78%
Icone Lingerie
3

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

57.14%
Savage X
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
MeUndies
50

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

16.67%
Pepper
4

✅ Good

15

✅ Good

78.95%
Cuup
43

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

6.52%
Negative Underwear
22

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

18.52%
Shinesty
9

✅ Good

21

✅ Good

70.0%
Shapermint
6

✅ Good

21

✅ Good

70.0%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Underwear - February - 2024

READ MORE

Underwear - January - 2024

READ MORE

Underwear - December - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - November - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - October - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands