Underwear - August - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Underwear

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Underwear

industry, for the month of

August

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

In August, Shapermint and MeUndies maintained their lead in emails. Shapermint sent 48 emails, whereas MeUndies sent 22, and promotional emails make up 86% of MeUndies' total.

Shifting to advertising, SAXX Underwear and MeUndies took action by creating 121 and 97 new ads respectively.

In terms of ad strategy, both SAXX Underwear and MeUndies favored images in their new ads this month. SAXX Underwear used 66 images compared to 55 videos, and MeUndies employed 80 images and 17 videos.

Emails sent on average

12.4

Ads published on average

54

Average Spam Score

3.4

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 12.4 57.84%
Heist
5

❌ Poor

60.0%

⚠️ Fair

SAXX Underwear
19

✅ Good

37.32%

❌ Poor

Culprit Underwear
9

❌ Poor

57.78%

⚠️ Fair

PSD Underwear
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

JustWears
2

❌ Poor

45.0%

❌ Poor

Lounge Underwear
16

✅ Good

56.25%

⚠️ Fair

Parade
21

✅ Good

63.29%

⚠️ Fair

Icone Lingerie
5

❌ Poor

46.0%

❌ Poor

Savage X
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

MeUndies
22

✅ Good

51.55%

❌ Poor

Pepper
15

✅ Good

83.07%

✅ Good

Cuup
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Negative Underwear
13

⚠️ Fair

60.31%

⚠️ Fair

Shinesty
11

❌ Poor

46.09%

❌ Poor

Shapermint
48

✅ Good

62.69%

⚠️ Fair

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -3.36 4,256.43 kb
Heist
✅ -3.1

⚠️ Fair

3,584.43 kb

✅ Good

SAXX Underwear
✅ -0.85

❌ Poor

10,044.95 kb

❌ Poor

Culprit Underwear
✅ -1.06

❌ Poor

3,646.13 kb

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
- -
JustWears
✅ -2.5

❌ Poor

1,903.49 kb

✅ Good

Lounge Underwear
✅ -2.28

❌ Poor

5,031.52 kb

❌ Poor

Parade
✅ -2.29

❌ Poor

4,419.84 kb

⚠️ Fair

Icone Lingerie
✅ -1.68

❌ Poor

6,558.49 kb

❌ Poor

Savage X
- -
MeUndies
✅ -1.42

❌ Poor

1,910.52 kb

✅ Good

Pepper
✅ -3.35

⚠️ Fair

500.93 kb

✅ Good

Cuup
- -
Negative Underwear
✅ -1.89

❌ Poor

3,079.66 kb

✅ Good

Shinesty
✅ -0.95

❌ Poor

7,669.05 kb

❌ Poor

Shapermint
✅ -7.59

✅ Good

3,463.41 kb

✅ Good

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 54.07 25.0
Heist
1

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

SAXX Underwear
121

❌ Poor

6

✅ Good

Culprit Underwear
5

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
26

✅ Good

13

✅ Good

JustWears
29

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

Lounge Underwear
73

❌ Poor

57

❌ Poor

Parade
64

❌ Poor

35

❌ Poor

Icone Lingerie
8

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

Savage X
60

❌ Poor

30

❌ Poor

MeUndies
97

❌ Poor

10

✅ Good

Pepper
47

✅ Good

13

✅ Good

Cuup
38

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

Negative Underwear
62

❌ Poor

19

✅ Good

Shinesty
90

❌ Poor

12

✅ Good

Shapermint
90

❌ Poor

25

⚠️ Fair

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 419 377 46.49%
Heist
0

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

100.0%
SAXX Underwear
66

✅ Good

55

✅ Good

45.45%
Culprit Underwear
0

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

100.0%
PSD Underwear
1

✅ Good

25

✅ Good

96.15%
JustWears
19

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

34.48%
Lounge Underwear
35

✅ Good

29

✅ Good

39.73%
Parade
16

✅ Good

46

✅ Good

71.88%
Icone Lingerie
6

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

25.0%
Savage X
34

✅ Good

25

✅ Good

41.67%
MeUndies
80

✅ Good

17

✅ Good

17.53%
Pepper
12

✅ Good

35

✅ Good

74.47%
Cuup
38

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
Negative Underwear
40

✅ Good

22

✅ Good

35.48%
Shinesty
52

✅ Good

37

✅ Good

41.11%
Shapermint
20

✅ Good

68

✅ Good

75.56%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Underwear - February - 2024

READ MORE

Underwear - January - 2024

READ MORE

Underwear - December - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - November - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - October - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - September - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands