Underwear - April - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Underwear

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Underwear

industry, for the month of

April

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

Shapermint led the pack in terms of emails sent with 52 emails in April, followed by Parade and Savage X with 33 and 31 emails sent, respectively.

Lounge Underwear dominated in ads created with 90 new ads made in April and had the highest number of ad copies with 55 ad copies in total. Other leading brands, including Shapermint, MeUndies, Savage X, and SAXX Underwear, sent 60 new ads during the same period. All of these brands focused on using more images than videos in their new ads. For instance, Lounge Underwear used 61 new images vs. 27 new videos in April.

Emails sent on average

17.9

Ads published on average

42

Average Spam Score

3.1

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 17.93 58.85%
Heist
14

❌ Poor

52.71%

❌ Poor

SAXX Underwear
25

✅ Good

45.6%

❌ Poor

Culprit Underwear
11

❌ Poor

66.91%

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
24

✅ Good

48.08%

❌ Poor

JustWears
7

❌ Poor

52.29%

❌ Poor

Lounge Underwear
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Parade
33

✅ Good

55.58%

⚠️ Fair

Icone Lingerie
4

❌ Poor

48.5%

❌ Poor

Savage X
31

✅ Good

54.97%

⚠️ Fair

MeUndies
23

✅ Good

65.48%

✅ Good

Pepper
21

✅ Good

77.0%

✅ Good

Cuup
1

❌ Poor

28.0%

❌ Poor

Negative Underwear
13

❌ Poor

56.46%

⚠️ Fair

Shinesty
10

❌ Poor

54.5%

⚠️ Fair

Shapermint
52

✅ Good

67.96%

✅ Good

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -3.08 2,981.29 kb
Heist
✅ -2.14

❌ Poor

4,869.65 kb

❌ Poor

SAXX Underwear
✅ -2.5

❌ Poor

4,847.14 kb

❌ Poor

Culprit Underwear
✅ -2.52

❌ Poor

1,264.9 kb

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
✅ -0.29

❌ Poor

3,373.56 kb

❌ Poor

JustWears
✅ -2.14

❌ Poor

6,275.27 kb

❌ Poor

Lounge Underwear
- -
Parade
✅ -1.73

❌ Poor

5,896.58 kb

❌ Poor

Icone Lingerie
✅ -4.43

✅ Good

5,566.48 kb

❌ Poor

Savage X
✅ -2.6

❌ Poor

1,691.93 kb

✅ Good

MeUndies
✅ -2.56

❌ Poor

1,420.23 kb

✅ Good

Pepper
✅ -2.85

⚠️ Fair

440.66 kb

✅ Good

Cuup
🟧 2.2

❌ Poor

2,259.77 kb

✅ Good

Negative Underwear
✅ -1.92

❌ Poor

4,044.35 kb

❌ Poor

Shinesty
✅ -3.1

⚠️ Fair

3,875.72 kb

❌ Poor

Shapermint
✅ -6.9

✅ Good

1,326.8 kb

✅ Good

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 41.87 20.4
Heist
1

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

SAXX Underwear
60

❌ Poor

2

✅ Good

Culprit Underwear
19

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

PSD Underwear
30

✅ Good

14

✅ Good

JustWears
19

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Lounge Underwear
90

❌ Poor

43

❌ Poor

Parade
57

❌ Poor

35

❌ Poor

Icone Lingerie
10

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Savage X
60

❌ Poor

19

⚠️ Fair

MeUndies
60

❌ Poor

3

✅ Good

Pepper
44

⚠️ Fair

13

✅ Good

Cuup
30

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

Negative Underwear
30

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

Shinesty
58

❌ Poor

32

❌ Poor

Shapermint
60

❌ Poor

13

✅ Good

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 333 281 44.75%
Heist
1

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

0.0%
SAXX Underwear
46

✅ Good

14

✅ Good

23.33%
Culprit Underwear
0

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

100.0%
PSD Underwear
3

✅ Good

23

✅ Good

76.67%
JustWears
9

✅ Good

10

✅ Good

52.63%
Lounge Underwear
61

✅ Good

27

✅ Good

30.0%
Parade
8

✅ Good

49

✅ Good

85.96%
Icone Lingerie
6

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

40.0%
Savage X
32

✅ Good

28

✅ Good

46.67%
MeUndies
53

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

11.67%
Pepper
3

✅ Good

41

✅ Good

93.18%
Cuup
28

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

6.67%
Negative Underwear
23

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

23.33%
Shinesty
29

✅ Good

24

✅ Good

41.38%
Shapermint
31

✅ Good

26

✅ Good

43.33%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Underwear - January - 2024

READ MORE

Underwear - December - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - November - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - October - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - September - 2023

READ MORE

Underwear - August - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands