Personal Care - July - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Personal Care

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Personal Care

industry, for the month of

July

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

In July, Mario Badescu maintains its lead in emails with 46, while Annmarie follows closely with 36 emails.

Regarding the number of new ads created, Dr. Squatch and Glossier are once again at the forefront, but this time Dr. Squatch (147) has surpassed Glossier (137). Remarkably, Glossier utilized the highest number of ad copies (35) this month.

In terms of ad strategy, Dr. Squatch focuses on videos, while Glossier favors images. Dr. Squatch uses 142 videos vs. only 5 images, and Glossier employs 72 images vs. 65 videos.

Emails sent on average

14.8

Ads published on average

45

Average Spam Score

1.7

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 14.8 55.11%
Native
9

❌ Poor

49.11%

❌ Poor

Briogeo
17

✅ Good

64.35%

✅ Good

Anese
14

⚠️ Fair

56.0%

⚠️ Fair

Mario Badescu
46

✅ Good

38.61%

❌ Poor

BRAVO SIERRA
13

❌ Poor

55.92%

⚠️ Fair

Billie
2

❌ Poor

57.5%

⚠️ Fair

Dr. Squatch
21

✅ Good

64.38%

✅ Good

Black Wolf
11

❌ Poor

70.82%

✅ Good

Burst Oral Care
6

❌ Poor

69.83%

✅ Good

Blume
9

❌ Poor

61.11%

✅ Good

Annmarie
36

✅ Good

58.69%

⚠️ Fair

Athena Club
7

❌ Poor

53.29%

⚠️ Fair

Naturally Serious
4

❌ Poor

62.25%

✅ Good

Bruush
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Glossier
27

✅ Good

54.15%

⚠️ Fair

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -1.73 2,701.21 kb
Native
✅ -1.27

❌ Poor

2,766.08 kb

⚠️ Fair

Briogeo
✅ -1.79

⚠️ Fair

1,850.69 kb

✅ Good

Anese
✅ -2.13

✅ Good

1,767.85 kb

✅ Good

Mario Badescu
✅ -1.67

⚠️ Fair

4,771.69 kb

❌ Poor

BRAVO SIERRA
✅ -1.63

⚠️ Fair

2,911.96 kb

⚠️ Fair

Billie
✅ -2.4

✅ Good

4,874.22 kb

❌ Poor

Dr. Squatch
✅ -1.9

⚠️ Fair

2,744.92 kb

⚠️ Fair

Black Wolf
✅ -1.9

⚠️ Fair

2,062.41 kb

✅ Good

Burst Oral Care
✅ -2.35

✅ Good

619.49 kb

✅ Good

Blume
🟧 0.19

❌ Poor

1,553.13 kb

✅ Good

Annmarie
✅ -2.49

✅ Good

1,053.38 kb

✅ Good

Athena Club
✅ -0.26

❌ Poor

1,685.88 kb

✅ Good

Naturally Serious
✅ -2.6

✅ Good

845.18 kb

✅ Good

Bruush
- -
Glossier
✅ -1.28

❌ Poor

3,715.99 kb

❌ Poor

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 45.27 12.47
Native
84

❌ Poor

6

✅ Good

Briogeo
34

✅ Good

8

✅ Good

Anese
68

❌ Poor

11

✅ Good

Mario Badescu
23

✅ Good

6

✅ Good

BRAVO SIERRA
5

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

Billie
38

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

Dr. Squatch
147

❌ Poor

16

❌ Poor

Black Wolf
25

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Burst Oral Care
0

✅ Good

-
Blume
62

❌ Poor

16

❌ Poor

Annmarie
9

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Athena Club
45

⚠️ Fair

2

✅ Good

Naturally Serious
2

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

Bruush
0

✅ Good

-
Glossier
137

❌ Poor

21

❌ Poor

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 239 428 63.03%
Native
35

✅ Good

47

✅ Good

55.95%
Briogeo
6

✅ Good

28

✅ Good

82.35%
Anese
40

✅ Good

28

✅ Good

41.18%
Mario Badescu
9

✅ Good

11

✅ Good

47.83%
BRAVO SIERRA
1

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

20.0%
Billie
19

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

50.0%
Dr. Squatch
5

✅ Good

142

✅ Good

96.6%
Black Wolf
5

✅ Good

20

✅ Good

80.0%
Burst Oral Care
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Blume
37

✅ Good

22

✅ Good

35.48%
Annmarie
2

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

77.78%
Athena Club
8

✅ Good

36

✅ Good

80.0%
Naturally Serious
0

✅ Good

2

✅ Good

100.0%
Bruush
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Glossier
72

✅ Good

65

✅ Good

47.45%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Personal Care - March - 2024

READ MORE

Personal Care - February - 2024

READ MORE

Personal Care - January - 2024

READ MORE

Personal Care - December - 2023

READ MORE

Personal Care - November - 2023

READ MORE

Personal Care - October - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands