Personal Care - April - 2023


The result? A comparative analysis that highlight the best performers of any ecommerce DTC niche, for any given month.

This benchmark analyze the behaviour of 15 Direct-To-Consumers (DTC) brands in the Supplement industry. Our goal is to compare their marketing velocity (how active they are in their digital marketing strategy) and how to they perform vs. each other.

Personal Care

This report is free to read and takes into consideration between 15 and 20 brands we compare month after month in the

Personal Care

industry, for the month of

April

2023

. We review data over their email marketing and advertising practices. Subscribe to our newsletter to receive exclusive reports.

Table of content

Highlights & Summary

In April, Annmarie took the lead in terms of emails sent with 35, followed by Mario Badescu with 30. Meanwhile, Dr. Squatch was the most active in ad creation with 60 new ads, followed closely by Black Wolf with 59. In terms of ad strategy, Black Wolf used 35 new videos and 24 new images, while Dr. Squatch focused 100% on using videos with 60 new videos and 0 new images. Stay tuned for more updates on beauty brands' marketing performance!

Emails sent on average

13.9

Ads published on average

26

Average Spam Score

1.6

Email Marketing Benchmark Breakdown

Email Marketing Performances

In this table, we benchmark how many emails brands have send and their average email scores, which we calculate using over 50 datapoints that measure how much best practices are ensured (spam score, email authenticiation & certificates, email size, subject line lenght, word & links count etc.)

Brand # Emails Sent Performance Email Scoring Performance
Average 13.87 55.54%
Native
10

❌ Poor

33.7%

❌ Poor

Briogeo
20

✅ Good

59.4%

⚠️ Fair

Anese
21

✅ Good

68.19%

✅ Good

Mario Badescu
30

✅ Good

38.1%

❌ Poor

BRAVO SIERRA
13

⚠️ Fair

58.38%

⚠️ Fair

Billie
3

❌ Poor

60.67%

⚠️ Fair

Dr. Squatch
14

⚠️ Fair

65.21%

✅ Good

Black Wolf
11

❌ Poor

65.73%

✅ Good

Burst Oral Care
6

❌ Poor

63.67%

✅ Good

Blume
14

⚠️ Fair

65.36%

✅ Good

Annmarie
35

✅ Good

56.31%

⚠️ Fair

Athena Club
6

❌ Poor

62.33%

✅ Good

Naturally Serious
5

❌ Poor

53.2%

⚠️ Fair

Bruush
0

❌ Poor

0%

❌ Poor

Glossier
20

✅ Good

48.4%

❌ Poor

Email Deliverability Performances

In this table, we benchmark how much the emails are optimized for delivery ie. if they're likely to pass spam filters and not land in the Promotions tab.

Brand Average Spam Score Performance Email Size Performance
Average -1.57 2,432.62 kb
Native
🟧 0.4

❌ Poor

3,773.15 kb

❌ Poor

Briogeo
✅ -1.22

❌ Poor

1,848.93 kb

✅ Good

Anese
✅ -1.73

⚠️ Fair

1,043.89 kb

✅ Good

Mario Badescu
✅ -2.49

✅ Good

5,937.69 kb

❌ Poor

BRAVO SIERRA
✅ -1.23

❌ Poor

2,614.49 kb

⚠️ Fair

Billie
✅ -1.73

⚠️ Fair

3,517.8 kb

❌ Poor

Dr. Squatch
✅ -1.59

⚠️ Fair

2,164.28 kb

✅ Good

Black Wolf
✅ -0.55

❌ Poor

1,971.23 kb

✅ Good

Burst Oral Care
✅ -2.35

✅ Good

672.65 kb

✅ Good

Blume
✅ -1.9

✅ Good

1,034.25 kb

✅ Good

Annmarie
✅ -2.76

✅ Good

1,159.77 kb

✅ Good

Athena Club
🟧 0.83

❌ Poor

933.97 kb

✅ Good

Naturally Serious
✅ -0.8

❌ Poor

693.88 kb

✅ Good

Bruush
- -
Glossier
✅ -0.08

❌ Poor

3,325.76 kb

❌ Poor

Email sent over time

Advertising performances and activity

Ad Velocity

In this table, we benchmark the brands velocity and performances - how much ads they've been publishing, and how many different copy has been used.

Brand New Ads Detected Performance Unique Copy Performance
Average 26.0 8.73
Native
28

⚠️ Fair

0

✅ Good

Briogeo
43

❌ Poor

12

❌ Poor

Anese
27

⚠️ Fair

10

❌ Poor

Mario Badescu
23

✅ Good

12

❌ Poor

BRAVO SIERRA
4

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

Billie
27

⚠️ Fair

4

✅ Good

Dr. Squatch
60

❌ Poor

3

✅ Good

Black Wolf
59

❌ Poor

0

✅ Good

Burst Oral Care
0

✅ Good

-
Blume
23

✅ Good

15

❌ Poor

Annmarie
15

✅ Good

3

✅ Good

Athena Club
29

❌ Poor

3

✅ Good

Naturally Serious
5

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

Bruush
0

✅ Good

-
Glossier
47

❌ Poor

6

✅ Good

Ad Diversity (Images vs. Videos ratio)

In this table, we benchmark the brands diversity of assets when it comes to Social Ads - especially the images vs. videos ratio.

Brand New Images Performance New Videos Performance Video Proportion
Average 167 217 55.64%
Native
22

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

14.29%
Briogeo
8

✅ Good

35

✅ Good

81.4%
Anese
19

✅ Good

8

✅ Good

29.63%
Mario Badescu
7

✅ Good

15

✅ Good

65.22%
BRAVO SIERRA
3

✅ Good

1

✅ Good

25.0%
Billie
11

✅ Good

15

✅ Good

55.56%
Dr. Squatch
0

✅ Good

60

✅ Good

100.0%
Black Wolf
24

✅ Good

35

✅ Good

59.32%
Burst Oral Care
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Blume
17

✅ Good

5

✅ Good

21.74%
Annmarie
6

✅ Good

9

✅ Good

60.0%
Athena Club
9

✅ Good

19

✅ Good

65.52%
Naturally Serious
1

✅ Good

4

✅ Good

80.0%
Bruush
0

✅ Good

0

✅ Good

-
Glossier
40

✅ Good

7

✅ Good

14.89%

Ads detected over time

Browse previous benchmarks

Personal Care - March - 2024

READ MORE

Personal Care - February - 2024

READ MORE

Personal Care - January - 2024

READ MORE

Personal Care - December - 2023

READ MORE

Personal Care - November - 2023

READ MORE

Personal Care - October - 2023

READ MORE

Some of the assets (emails, ads) used in this benchmark to measure performance

No items found.

Related brands